AEROSTAT / GLOBAL STATE SERIES

Observed path vs. endpoint geodesic

QUALIFYING AIRCRAFT--
MEDIAN--
90TH PERCENTILE--
MEAN--
MATHEMATICAL FORMALISM

A random-scale bridge on the sphere

The histogram looks approximately lognormal, but the geometry suggests a more informative construction. Each observed route is treated as a random transverse departure from the unique minor great-circle arc joining its endpoints, then tested for whether it belongs to the ordinary bridge population or a near-geodesic boundary population.

READ THE ACADEMIC NOTE · PDF · 5 PAGES
FROM SKY TO DIAGNOSIS
  1. A direct referenceAircraft rarely follow the shortest spherical path between their observed endpoints, so the endpoint geodesic is a reference rather than a prescribed route.
  2. Scale and shapeWe write each route's RMS deviation as \(D=AQ\): \(A\) sets its overall magnitude, while \(Q\) captures its standardized endpoint-pinned shape.
  3. The smoothing predictionBroad variation in \(A\) should suppress the skewness and kurtosis contributed by \(Q\), making the Brownian product nearly Gaussian in log space.
  4. The boundary populationThe observed log-skewness is \(-2.40\), with 53 tracks recording RMS deviation at or below \(0.1\) km and forming a distinct lower-tail boundary.
  5. Sequential diagnosisPrefix residuals and Wasserstein gaps estimate how long one must watch before assigning a single aircraft to that boundary component.

1 / SPHERICAL PATH AND REFERENCE ARC

For aircraft \(i\), let \(x_i(t)\in S_R^2\) be its recorded position at dimensionless normalized time \(0\leq t\leq1\), where \(S_R^2\) is the spherical Earth of radius \(R=6371.0088\) km. Its endpoint geodesic is

\[ g_i(s)=\operatorname{Exp}_{x_i(0)}\!\left(s\,\operatorname{Log}_{x_i(0)}x_i(1)\right), \qquad 0\leq s\leq1. \]

Here \(g_i\) is the minor great-circle arc, \(s\in[0,1]\) is dimensionless progress along it, \(\operatorname{Log}_{x_i(0)}x_i(1)\) is the tangent vector at the first position pointing toward the last, and \(\operatorname{Exp}_{x_i(0)}\) maps a scaled tangent vector back to the sphere. Thus \(g_i(s)\) is a position, while distances along or from \(g_i\) are measured in kilometres.

USE-CASE READING This constructs the direct spherical reference route against which we compare the aircraft's recorded ground track.

2 / OBSERVED DEVIATION

Let \(d_{S_R^2}(a,b)\) denote spherical distance in kilometres and let \(g_i([0,1])\) denote the set of every position on the reference arc. The cross-track displacement is

\[ \eta_i(t)=d_{S_R^2}\!\left(x_i(t),g_i([0,1])\right). \]

Here \(\eta_i(t)\) is the shortest distance in kilometres from the recorded position to that arc. For sample times \(t_1,\ldots,t_n\), with \(n=60\), the primary histogram statistic is the root-mean-square deviation

\[ D_i=\left[\frac{1}{n}\sum_{j=1}^{n}\eta_i(t_j)^2\right]^{1/2}. \]

Consequently, \(D_i\) is one nonnegative kilometre-valued summary for aircraft \(i\).

USE-CASE READING This reduces each 60-point flight track to its typical sideways separation from the direct reference route.

3 / LOGNORMAL HYPOTHESIS

Let \(d_0=1\) km be a fixed reference distance, making \(D_i/d_0\) dimensionless. The simplest positive, right-skewed population model assumes that many multiplicative route effects combine in logarithmic space, so

\[ \log(D_i/d_0)\sim\mathcal N(\mu,\sigma^2), \] \[ f_D(d)=\frac{1}{d\sigma\sqrt{2\pi}} \exp\!\left[-\frac{(\log(d/d_0)-\mu)^2}{2\sigma^2}\right], \qquad d>0. \]

Here \(\mathcal N(\mu,\sigma^2)\) is a normal law with log-mean \(\mu\) and log-variance \(\sigma^2\); \(f_D(d)\) is the probability density of RMS deviation evaluated at distance \(d>0\) km, and \(\log\) denotes the natural logarithm. Below, \(\log D\) and \(\log A\) abbreviate \(\log(D/d_0)\) and \(\log(A/d_0)\).

USE-CASE READING This is the initial claim that flight-to-flight RMS deviations may follow one familiar positive, right-skewed distribution.

4 / RANDOM-SCALE BRIDGE

Separate the magnitude of a route's departure from its standardized shape:

\[ \eta_i(t)=A_i Z_i(t),\quad D_i=A_iQ_i,\quad Q_i=\left[\int_0^1 Z_i(t)^2\,dt\right]^{1/2}. \]

The dimensionless bridge \(Z_i(t)\), pinned by \(Z_i(0)=Z_i(1)=0\), represents standardized route shape; \(A_i>0\) is a latent route-specific scale in kilometres; and the dimensionless functional \(Q_i\) is the continuous-time RMS magnitude of that shape. If \(\log A_i\) is Gaussian and variation in \(Q_i\) is comparatively modest, then \(\log D_i=\log A_i+\log Q_i\) is approximately Gaussian.

USE-CASE READING This asks whether large and small deviations differ mainly by overall scale while sharing broadly comparable route shapes.

5 / BROWNIAN-BRIDGE BASELINE

A tractable baseline for the standardized route shape is a standard Brownian bridge with Karhunen-Loeve expansion

\[ Z(t)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{\sqrt{2}\,\xi_k}{\pi k} \sin(\pi kt), \qquad \xi_k\overset{\mathrm{iid}}{\sim}\mathcal N(0,1). \]

Here \(k=1,2,\ldots\) indexes sine-wave modes, \(\pi\) is the circle constant, and \(\xi_k\overset{\mathrm{iid}}{\sim}\mathcal N(0,1)\) means that the mode coefficients are independent standard-normal variables. Its integrated squared displacement is

\[ Q^2=\int_0^1Z(t)^2\,dt =\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{\xi_k^2}{\pi^2k^2}. \]

Thus \(Q^2\) is a weighted sum of independent one-degree-of-freedom chi-square variables and \(Q\) is its nonnegative square root.

USE-CASE READING This supplies a mathematically tractable null model for irregular route shapes that begin and end on the reference arc.

6 / RESULTING POPULATION LAW

For a generic route, write \(D=AQ\), and let \(f_A\) and \(f_Q\) be the probability densities of its independent positive scale \(A\) and shape factor \(Q\). Their product has density

\[ f_D(d)=\int_0^{\infty} f_A\!\left(\frac{d}{q}\right)f_Q(q)\,\frac{dq}{q}. \]

Here \(q>0\) is the integration variable and \(1/q\) is the product-transformation Jacobian. This integral is the geometry-driven population law for kilometre-valued \(D\); a single lognormal is recovered approximately when \(Q\) is concentrated relative to \(A\).

USE-CASE READING This combines variation in overall route scale with variation in route shape to predict the fleet-wide deviation histogram.

THEOREM

7 / LOGNORMAL SMOOTHING

Consider a sequence indexed by \(\ell\) of scale-shape populations \(D_\ell=A_\ell Q_\ell\). Let \(U_\ell=\log A_\ell\sim\mathcal N(\mu_\ell,\sigma_\ell^2)\) be independent of \(V_\ell=\log Q_\ell\), and define its mean \(m_\ell=\mathbb E[V_\ell]\), variance \(\tau_\ell^2=\operatorname{Var}(V_\ell)\), and standardized log-deviation

\[ W_\ell=\frac{\log D_\ell-(\mu_\ell+m_\ell)}{\sqrt{\sigma_\ell^2+\tau_\ell^2}}. \]

If the bridge's share of total log-variance satisfies \(\tau_\ell^2/(\sigma_\ell^2+\tau_\ell^2)\to0\), then \(W_\ell\Rightarrow\mathcal N(0,1)\), where \(\Rightarrow\) denotes convergence in distribution. More quantitatively, if \(G_\ell\sim\mathcal N(m_\ell,\tau_\ell^2)\) is a Gaussian variable matching the first two moments of \(V_\ell\), then

\[ d_{W_2}\!\left(W_\ell,\mathcal N(0,1)\right) \leq \frac{d_{W_2}(V_\ell,G_\ell)}{\sqrt{\sigma_\ell^2+\tau_\ell^2}}. \]

Here \(d_{W_2}\) is the quadratic Wasserstein distance between probability laws. Proof sketch. Replace \(V_\ell\) by \(G_\ell\); then \(U_\ell+G_\ell\) is exactly Gaussian. Convolution with the independent Gaussian \(U_\ell\) contracts Wasserstein distance, and the independent coupling bound \(d_{W_2}(V_\ell,G_\ell)\leq\sqrt{2}\,\tau_\ell\) completes the convergence argument.

USE-CASE READING Across route populations, the fleet histogram becomes lognormal when variation in overall deviation scale overwhelms the remaining variation in standardized route shape.

PROPOSITION

8 / EXACT CUMULANT ATTENUATION

For one fixed population, let \(U=\log A\), \(V=\log Q\), \(\tau_Q^2=\operatorname{Var}(V)\), and \(W=[\log D-(\mathbb E[U]+\mathbb E[V])]/\sqrt{\sigma_A^2+\tau_Q^2}\), where \(\sigma_A^2=\operatorname{Var}(U)\). If \(U\) is Gaussian and independent of \(V\), additivity of cumulants gives, for every integer \(r\geq3\),

\[ \kappa_r(W)= \frac{\kappa_r(\log Q)} {(\sigma_A^2+\tau_Q^2)^{r/2}}. \]

Here \(\kappa_r(X)\) denotes the order-\(r\) cumulant of \(X\). In particular, with bridge variance share \(\rho=\tau_Q^2/(\sigma_A^2+\tau_Q^2)\),

\[ \operatorname{Skew}(W)=\operatorname{Skew}(\log Q)\rho^{3/2}, \qquad \operatorname{ExKurt}(W)=\operatorname{ExKurt}(\log Q)\rho^2. \]

Here \(\operatorname{Skew}\) is standardized third cumulant and \(\operatorname{ExKurt}\) is excess kurtosis, the standardized fourth cumulant. The product is exactly lognormal only when \(\log Q\) is Gaussian as well; otherwise these identities quantify the residual asymmetry and tail shape.

USE-CASE READING This tells us exactly how much of the flight histogram's non-lognormal shape can survive after route-scale variation is added.

BROWNIAN-BRIDGE COROLLARY

9 / AN EXPLICIT THRESHOLD

For the Brownian bridge, the spectral law of \(Q^2\) has Laplace transform, for transform parameter \(\lambda>0\),

\[ \mathbb E[e^{-\lambda Q^2}]= \left(\frac{\sqrt{2\lambda}}{\sinh\sqrt{2\lambda}}\right)^{1/2}. \]

Here \(\mathbb E\) denotes expectation and \(\sinh\) is the hyperbolic sine. A numerical Karhunen-Loeve evaluation of the spectral sum gives

\[ \begin{aligned} \operatorname{SD}(\log Q)&\approx0.385,\\ \operatorname{Skew}(\log Q)&\approx0.178,\\ \operatorname{ExKurt}(\log Q)&\approx-0.348. \end{aligned} \]

Here \(\operatorname{SD}\) is standard deviation, and \(\sigma_A=\operatorname{SD}(\log A)\) is the log-scale spread defined above. Substitution into the exact formulas shows that \(\sigma_A\gtrsim0.50\) makes both resulting standardized cumulants smaller than approximately \(0.05\) in magnitude.

USE-CASE READING For our bridge baseline, even moderately varied route scales should make the observed fleet distribution look very nearly lognormal.

EMPIRICAL DIAGNOSTIC

10 / THE SINGLE-POPULATION MODEL FAILS

For the 1,776 aircraft with positive recorded RMS deviation \(D\) in kilometres, \(\operatorname{SD}(\log D)\approx1.465\). Under the independent Brownian decomposition, matching this log-variance would imply \(\sigma_A\approx1.413\) and hence predicted log-skewness and log-excess-kurtosis near \(0.003\) and \(-0.002\). Their sample values are instead approximately \(-2.40\) and \(8.11\).

This discrepancy rejects the single independent lognormal-scale Brownian-bridge description of the full cohort. It is concentrated in a near-geodesic boundary population: 53 aircraft have recorded RMS deviation at or below \(0.1\) km. The data therefore point toward a boundary mixture or multiple route regimes rather than one universal product law \(D=AQ\).

USE-CASE READING Real flight tracks contain a distinct nearly direct group that the otherwise strongly smoothing Brownian product model cannot explain.

SEQUENTIAL DIAGNOSTIC

11 / HOW LONG UNTIL THE BOUNDARY IS VISIBLE?

Once the boundary component is forced by the cohort, the time-series question is individual: after \(n\) one-minute samples, can we assign one aircraft to that component? Define the prefix residual energy

\[ R_n^2=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{j=1}^{n}\eta(t_j)^2. \]

If \(C=0\) denotes the near-geodesic boundary population and \(C=1\) the ordinary bridge population, then persistent small residuals are decisive only when they are rare under \(C=1\). A small-ball bound of the form

\[ \mathbb P_1(R_n\leq\tau)\leq e^{-nI(\tau)} \]

implies that the posterior probability \(\mathbb P(C=0\mid R_n\leq\tau)\) rises once the ordinary population has too little mass near zero. For the current hour, using \(\tau=0.1\) km and the final endpoint geodesic reference, the diagnostic crosses high posterior confidence after roughly 41 elapsed minutes.

The same stopping idea has a transport version. For \(Y_n=\log(R_n/d_0)\), let \(P_{0,n}\) and \(P_{1,n}\) be the boundary and ordinary prefix laws. The Wasserstein gap

\[ \Delta_n=W_2(P_{0,n},P_{1,n}) \]

is compared with a bootstrap uncertainty floor. Classification is most credible when individual posterior evidence and population-level Wasserstein separation are both large.

USE-CASE READING The key signal is not whether an aircraft looks straight for a few minutes; it is whether near-perfect geodesic behavior persists long enough to be unlikely under ordinary route physics.

Interpretation. The theorem identifies exactly when multiplicative scale variation suppresses bridge-shape nonnormality. The observed lower-tail boundary decisively violates that single-population approximation, turning route-class heterogeneity from a qualitative possibility into a model requirement. A natural next law is \(f_D(d)=\pi_0f_0(d)+\sum_c\pi_cf_D(d\mid c)\), where \(f_0\) is a near-geodesic boundary density and the remaining terms are continuous route-class densities. The sequential extension then turns that mixture into an operational diagnostic: posterior small-ball evidence and the Wasserstein gap estimate when a single observed aircraft is credibly part of the boundary population.

ENERGY AND FUEL COUNTERFACTUAL

What would the excess ground track cost?

For aircraft \(i\), let \(P_i\) be observed polyline length and \(G_i\) its endpoint great-circle distance, both in kilometres. Their cohort-wide excess is \(\Delta s_\Sigma=\sum_i(P_i-G_i)\). In steady, level flight, let \(M\) be representative aircraft mass, \(g\) gravitational acceleration, \(L\) lift, and \(F_{\mathrm{drag}}\) drag force; then \(L\approx Mg\), and mechanical work is drag times distance:

\[ F_{\mathrm{drag}}\approx\frac{L}{L/F_{\mathrm{drag}}} \approx\frac{Mg}{L/F_{\mathrm{drag}}}, \qquad \Delta E_{\mathrm{mech}}\approx \frac{Mg}{L/F_{\mathrm{drag}}}\,\Delta s_\Sigma. \]

Here \(\Delta E_{\mathrm{mech}}\) is estimated excess mechanical energy and \(L/F_{\mathrm{drag}}\) is the lift-to-drag ratio. With fuel-to-propulsive efficiency \(\eta_p\), jet-fuel net calorific value \(H_f\), fuel density \(\rho_f\), U.S. gallon volume \(V_{\mathrm{gal}}\), and price \(p_f\) per gallon,

\[ \Delta m_f=\frac{\Delta E_{\mathrm{mech}}}{\eta_p H_f}, \qquad \Delta C=\frac{\Delta m_f}{\rho_fV_{\mathrm{gal}}}\,p_f. \]

Thus \(\Delta m_f\) is estimated excess fuel mass and \(\Delta C\) is its estimated monetary value.

EXCESS DISTANCE--
MECHANICAL WORK--
JET FUEL MASS--
JET FUEL VOLUME--
SPOT-VALUE COST--

ADJUST THE REPRESENTATIVE AIRCRAFT

Sensitivity range: a 40 t aircraft at \(L/F_{\mathrm{drag}}=19,\eta_p=0.40\) gives about $56,000; a 100 t aircraft at \(L/F_{\mathrm{drag}}=15,\eta_p=0.30\) gives about $236,000. The central 70 t narrowbody-like case is an order-of-magnitude estimate, not a fleet inventory.

Not all of this is avoidable loss. Endpoint geodesics are counterfactuals, not necessarily flyable routes. The model ignores winds, altitude changes, aircraft type, payload, airway constraints, weather avoidance, holding, and the fact that this is a one-hour track window. It covers only the 1,780 quality-filtered aircraft and therefore is not a global aviation total.